Press Trust of India : Mumbai, Mon Oct 22
2012, 03:55 hrs
The Bombay High Court has held that a
member of a village panchayat cannot be disqualified just because her spouse
had encroached upon a government land or public property.
To incur disqualification under the law,
such encroachment should have been done by the member alone and not by his or
her spouse, the court ruled.
Accordingly, the court quashed an order of
the Pune Divisional Commissioner, which had disqualified Yallubai Kamble,
sarpanch of Phaye village in Kolhapur district, from being a member of the Gram
Panchayat on the ground that she was living with her husband who had encroached
upon government land.
“It will not be possible to hold that if an
act complained of has been committed, in this case by the husband of the
petitioner, then, the petitioner is disqualified,” observed Justice S C
Dharmadhikari recently.
“If the petitioner had encroached upon the
government land, it was a different matter. That her husband has encroached
upon a government land is an admitted position and obviously the petitioner
resides with her husband. For that she should be disqualified is really reading
something in the provision which is not there,” the judge said. “By reading in
the provision that the petitioner is the wife and therefore party to
encroachment or having a nexus therewith, she is held to be disqualified and
disabled. That is not what is provided by the statute,” said the judge.
“If the act is committed by somebody other
than the elected person and therefore, he or she incurs or invites
disqualification, is not a conclusion, which can be drawn or arrived at on a
plain reading of section 14(1)(j3) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act,” the judge
noted.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/hc-panchayat-member-can-t-be-disqualified-if-spouse-at-fault/1020306
Related News
Six gram panchayat members disqualified in
1 yr for misuse of power
Nisha Nambiar : Tue Oct 23 2012, 04:59 hrs
Six members of gram panchayat in the Pune
division have been disqualified in the last one year. While one of them is from
Pune, the others are from Kolhapur and Satara. These members were found
misusing powers under the Maharashtra Gram Panchayat Act, 1958.
“These persons have been found violating
the rules mentioned in Section 39 (1) of Panchayat Act. Action against the
members was taken after all the gram panchayat members agreed for it,’’ said a
senior official from the divisional commissionerate.
But recently, the Bombay High Court had
held that a member of the village panchayat cannot be disqualified just because
her spouse had encroached upon a government land or public property. Officials
said such decisions would hinder their effort to make gram panchayat
transparent.
The court has stated that to incur
disqualification under the law such encroachment should have been done by the
member and not by his or her spouse. Thus, the court quashed the order of the
Pune Divisional Commissioner which had disqualified Yallubai Kamble, sarpanch
of Phaye village in Kolhapur district. Divisional Commissionerate officials
said gram panchayat members themselves had agreed to disqualify him.
“There were complaints and the decision was
taken after the hearing,’’ said the official. Now with the court observing in
her favour by stating that it is not the petitioner who has committed the
crime, divisional commissionerate officials said “such favours are rampant at
village levels”.
Officials said the disqualification is done
after a thorough assessment and in agreement with gram sabha members. In the
last one year, members from Wadanage, Daryache Wadgaon, Kasarwadi, Chokak in
Kolhapur and Deogaon in Satara and Keshavnagar grampanchayat in Pune were
disqualified under the same section. “There is definitely irregularity found in
their functioning. It could also amount to misuse of power and some of them do
pass on the favours. This is serious and a member is disqualified after a
decision by the gram panchayat and a hearing before the additional
commissioner,’’ said the member.
There are also cases of misappropriation of
funds for several festivals or syphoning of funds or giving out of turn
sanctions to relatives or acquaintances. “These are very common reasons and
several such cases come up in hearings. But this ruling opens up a doorway for
the relatives of the members,’’ said another official.
While the rule strictly mentions - misuse
of power for the person or for their own interest, the ruling comes as a blow
for the officials taking action against these members. “Most of the members
have their relatives elected to the gram panchayat and unless such favours are
checked, gram panchayat cannot function transparently,’’ said a gram panchayat
member from Pune’s Paud village.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/six-gram-panchayat-members-disqualified-in-1-yr-for-misuse-of-power/1020830/0
No comments:
Post a Comment