1 D.B. CIVIL WRIT
PETITION (PIL) No.660/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
D.B.
CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PIL) No.660/2013
Bhanwaroo
Khan & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
DATE OF ORDER : 19th
February, 2013
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. K. MATHUR
Mr. Sandeep Shah, for petitioners.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. The petitioners have preferred
this public interest litigation for removal of illegal encroachments from land
bearing Khasra No.189 situated in Village Kalusar, Tehsil Sardarsahar, District
Churu, which is 'Gair Mumkin Paitan'.
3. Submission of learned counsel for
petitioners is that land in dispute bearing Khasra No.189 is described as 'Gair Mumkin Paitan' in Jambandi for
S.Yr.2062, the respondent Nos.5 to 8 have encroached on the said government
land. He submitted that every year an action is taken against respondents and
even their articles are ceased, but still they have not been removed so far by
District Administration. He further submitted that the Hon'ble Apex Court in Jagpal Singh vs. Punjab State, Civil Appeal
No.1132/2011 decided on 28th January, 2011 has held that there cannot be
any allotment and regularization of land falling in catchment of a bond/water
reservoirs. He also referred the Circular dated 25th April, 2011 (Annex.12)
issued 2 D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PIL) No.660/2013 by State Government on the
basis of judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court. He also submitted that petitioners
have made number of representations to all the concerned authorities including
SDO and Collector and also to Hon'ble The Chief Minister, but no action has
been taken against respondent Nos. 5 to 8 in this regard.
4. We have considered
the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners.
5. From Revenue Record i.e.
Jamabandi placed on record as Annexure-11, it is clear that land bearing Khasra
No.189 in Village Kalusar is 'Gair Mumkin
Paitan' and as per the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court, it cannot be
allotted and regularized in favour of anyone. We further find that petitioners
have represented the District Administration, but no action has been taken so
far.
6. In these circumstances, we are
of the view that petitioners should approach the District Collector, Churu
again along with order of this Court and Collector, Churu be directed to
examine and decide the representation of the petitioners, in accordance with
law and in case, any persons are found in illegal encroachment over the land in
dispute, then to take immediate action for their removal.
7. Consequently, we dispose of
this writ petition with liberty to petitioners to move fresh representation in
this regard. It is directed that in case, the petitioners move a representation
within a period of fifteen days from today along with copy of this order, then
District Collector, Churu is directed to examine and decide the same within a
period of 3 D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PIL) No.660/2013 one month thereafter and
in case, a finding is recorded that there is encroachment over the land in
dispute, then to take immediate action for removal of encroachments over land
in dispute, in accordance with law.
8. The stay application
No.536/2013 also stands disposed of.
(V. K. MATHUR),J.
(NARENDRA
KUMAR JAIN),J.
Sanjay, JrPA
S.No.
“All corrections made in the
judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.”
Sanjay Solanki
JUNIOR PERSONAL
ASSISTANT.
http://courtnic.nic.in/jodh/judfile.asp?ID=CW&nID=660&yID=2013&doj=2%2F19%2F2013
No comments:
Post a Comment