Sunday, March 7, 2021

Chattisgarh High Court in Gyan Prakash Sahu & Ors. v. State of Chattisgarh & Ors. [Order dated 19.04.2018]

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPPIL No. 11 of 2018 

1. Gyan Praksh Sahu S/o Rajendra Kumar Sahu, Aged About 30 Years, 
2. Vyas Narayan S/o Pancham Dhurander Aged About 52 Years, 
3. Yaman Lal Sahu S/o Gulal Ram Sahu, Aged About 35 Years, 
All are R/o Khamhariya (D), P.O. Khamhariya (D), Tahsil Patan, Civil And Revenue District Durg Chhattisgarh.                             
                                                                                    ---- Petitioners 
Versus 

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh. 
2. The Collector, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 
3. Sub Divisional Officer, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 
4. The Tahsildar, Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 
5. Gram Panchayat, Khamhariya, Through Its President, Tahsil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 
6. Gram Panchayat, Khamhariya, Through Its Secretary, Tahsil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 
7. Gram Panchayat Kosariya Marar (Patel) Samaj, Through Its President Village Khamhariya (Patan), District Durg Chhattisgarh. 
                                                                                    ---- Respondents


For Petitioners Shri Punit Ruparel, Advocate. For Respondents/State Shri Y.S. Thakur, Additional Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma 
Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra J.


19/04/2018

1. It is putforth that the respondent No.7 Gram Panchayat Kosariya Marar (Patel) Samaj has constructed a building over nistari land reserved to be used as compost pit, locally known as guruva.

2. At this juncture, learned State counsel would submit that a case of encroachment of Government nistari land has been registered against the respondent No.7 and the notice has been issued to the said party, which is evident from the document Annxure A-1.

3. Since the respondent/State has already initiated the proceeding, the writ petition is disposed of with observation that the competent authority shall complete the proceedings within a period of three months from today, keeping in view the observations made by the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others reported in (2011) 11 SCC 396. 


                        Sd/-                                                                        Sd/- 
                     Judge                                                                      Judge
            Prashant Kumar Mishra                                       Ram Prasanna Sharma 

No comments:

Post a Comment